Relevant Life vs Personal Life Insurance
Both protect your family from the same risk. The difference is that relevant life can be funded by your business as an allowable expense.
The short answer
A tax-efficient life insurance term policy your limited company takes out and pays for on your behalf, so your family receives a lump sum if you die.
A policy you take out and pay for yourself, which pays out to your family if you die during the term.
Both pay your family a lump sum if you die during the term. The difference is who owns and funds the policy. With relevant life the company pays the premiums as a business expense; with personal life you pay them from income you have already been taxed on.
Which is right for you?
- You pay yourself a low salary and do not want premiums based on drawings that do not reflect your true worth
- You want your limited company to pay the premiums and put them through as a business expense
- You have no group death-in-service scheme because you are the only employee, or one of very few
- You are self-employed with no company structure to pay premiums on your behalf
- You are employed but your employer offers no life cover, or you would lose cover if you changed jobs
- You need cover to protect a personal mortgage rather than business debts
- Your partner or dependants need financial protection independently of your employment status
Side-by-side comparison
Real-world scenarios
Illustrative examples showing how the decision tends to play out. Names and figures are for illustration only.
Sandra, limited company director with an old personal policy
Take Sandra, a limited company director. Sandra’s business is tight: planned dividends, controlled costs. Her life insurance hasn’t had the same attention. It’s still a personal policy from years ago.
Read the full scenario
If she dies unexpectedly, a personally owned policy will usually form part of the estate, and HMRC says insurers will often wait for probate documents before paying. That can leave her family dealing with the business, the household and the legal process all at once.
Now take the same need for cover but arrange it as relevant life through the company and write it into trust from the start. The company pays the premium. The qualifying element can fall outside the benefits charge. No Class 1A NIC is due where the exemption applies. The trust is there to direct the proceeds to the family without relying on the estate process in the same way. The cover is still there to protect the family, but the route the money takes is cleaner and, in most cases, quicker.
Barry, 40, director of a small consultancy
Take Barry, a 40-year-old consultancy director on a £12,570 salary with the rest paid in dividends, a common tax-efficient setup. He wants £750,000 of cover over a 25-year term.
Read the full scenario
Through a personal policy, he might pay around £50 per month in premiums. To fund that £50, he needs to draw income, pay tax on it, and then pay the premium. At a higher effective tax rate, the real cost from gross company income is closer to £85 per month.
Through a relevant life policy, the company pays the £50 premium directly. After corporation tax relief at 25%, the net cost to the company is around £37.50 per month. Same cover. Considerably less cost. The payout, if it were needed, would go into a discretionary trust and sit outside Barry’s estate for inheritance tax purposes.
Louise, director with an existing personal policy
Louise is a director who draws a salary, takes the rest through dividends, and already has a personal life policy. The cover itself may be sensible. The tax route is not.
Read the full scenario
Each premium is funded from money that has already moved through the company and into her hands. If similar cover is instead arranged as relevant life, the company pays the premium, the section 307 exemption may keep the qualifying element outside the benefits code, and no Class 1A NIC is due where the exemption applies. If it is also written in trust, the trustees rather than the estate can receive the payout, which is exactly why relevant life is often a better fit for directors with dependants.
The rule of thumb
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to be a company director to get relevant life insurance?
Can sole traders get relevant life insurance?
Does relevant life count as a benefit in kind?
How much could I save with a relevant life policy compared to a personal life policy?
Can I switch from personal to relevant life insurance?
Does a relevant life policy form part of my estate?
Related decision guides
Not sure which is right for you?
Speak to one of our advisers. We will compare both options based on your specific circumstances, free and with no obligation.
Get a Free Quote →This guide is general information about how these policies work and is not personal advice or a recommendation. Tax treatment depends on your individual circumstances and the rules may change. The figures in the scenarios are illustrative only. Consider speaking to a qualified adviser before deciding what is right for you.